Click
here
for PDF format
Participants' Responses to This Interview Summary
What
is pdf
?
Summary of Meeting with Craig Westover
Civic Caucus, 8301 Creekside Circle, Bloomington, MN
55437
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Guest
speaker: Craig Westover,
writer, contract columnist, St. Paul Pioneer Press
Present:
Verne Johnson, chair (by
phone), Lee Canning, Paul Gilje, Jim Hetland, and
John Rollwagen
A. Context of the meeting--
The Civic Caucus is reviewing a
possible connection
between availability of quality public affairs information
and a strong representative
democracy. Today the Civic Caucus is meeting a veteran
writer on the Twin Cities area
scene.
B. Introduction--
Paul introduced Craig Westover,
a free-lance writer who writes a
weekly column for the opinion page of the St. Paul
Pioneer Press. Westover also has
worked in corporate communications for NCR and in
strategic marketing and quality
assurance for NCR/AT&T. His frequent letter-writing to the
Pioneer Press led to
different opportunities with the newspaper, and most
recently he was offered a weekly
column on the opinion pages. He characterizes himself as a
libertarian/conservative.
He was a psychology major in college
C. Comments and discussion--
In Westover's comments and in
discussion with the
Civic Caucus the following points were raised:
1. Fruitful area of writing for specialized publications--
As Westover was
highlighting his past success in using newspaper articles
as ideas for articles in
magazines, Lee Canning suggested that maybe the Civic
Caucus would have some
success in getting more coverage of its work by submitting
articles to selected local
publications.
2. Newspapers' business model no longer fits their core
competencies--
The core competency of newspapers was and still is their
ability to gather news.
However, advertising, not subscription fees, is what pays
for the paper and accounts for
profits. The business model is putting consumers in touch
with advertisers.
The business model of newspapers has been a broadcast
model–distribute
paper and advertisers’ messages to as many people as
possible. The Internet, cable
television, specialty publications and data mining for
direct mail have made possible
more targeted marketing opportunities for
advertisers--fewer people seeing ads, but
identified as people with interest in the advertisers’
products.
Newspapers need to figure out how to take their core
competency of
newsgathering and exploit other outlets to narrowcast to
specific audiences to attract
advertisers.
In the 1980s the news was "broadcast" through the
newspapers. Today
newspapers still are following that model, although it is
obsolete, and many more outlets
for distributing the news exist. For example, the
Pioneer Press could have a 6 p.m.
newscast on the Internet. (It was noted that the New
York Times already has such a
newscast.)
Too many newspapers, faced with the need to provide major
returns for
investors, economize by cutting back on their core
competency, news. They have
failed to learn more about their subscribers for targeting
purposes. Someone could
subscribe for the newspaper for 30 years and all the
owners would know is the
individual's name, address, and length time that someone
has been a subscriber.
Owners won't even know which parts of the paper are
favored by different readers. On
an individual basis, newspapers collect data on readers by
geographic area, but not
down to the individual level–which is what targeted
advertising requires.
Lee Canning noted that the Star Tribune made major
changes in its format
based on research. The Star Tribune decided it had
to reach out to people under 40 to
meet their business model. The result is a heavy load of
entertainment news. The
Pioneer Press has a strategy of emphasizing local
news–news that can’t be found at
other sources. A problem is determining if a given piece
of local news is important, or as
Lee noted, more entertainment value.
3. Focusing on the business model, not the core competency --
Continuing the discussion, John Rollwagen summarized that
the newspaper owners
have decided to focus their survival on the business
model, not trying to find a way to
maintain their core competency. Westover agreed, saying
that publishers of
newspapers invariably come from the sales and marketing
side of the business, not the
news side. Newspapers lay off employees, trapped as they
are by a business model
from the 1980s--that a company can cut its way to
profitability. That may work over the
short term, but it ultimately makes a business less
competitive in its core competency.
4. J-school student's comments on being disillusioned--
Westover cited
an article by a student at Northwestern University in the
March 2007 issue of
The
Newspaper Guild Reporter
(http://newsguild.org/gr/index.php?ID=3769),
who was
complaining about a shift in philosophy of the Medill
school at Northwestern. "I believed
the school represented journalism as the voice of the
people, the voice of justice and an
arena for ideas. Instead, Medill is teaching about the
market, the consumer and
advertising," wrote the student, Loka Ashwood. This is the
disconnect between the
student’s perspective and the real world business
perspective, Westover said. It is also
a disconnect between the newspaper's giving in-depth
political information, and the
business model.
5. Core competency can survive if newspapers take new
views of their
audiences--
Targeting audiences is key, and
newspapers haven't yet figured out how to
do that, Westover said. Look at the TV ads during the
Sunday afternoon golf
tournaments, he said. With Lexus and Cadillac ads, those
folks know that older,
wealthier, males are watching the golf tournaments. This
is the "narrowcast", not
"broadcast" view that is needed.
6. Too many "silos" in the newspaper --
Westover said the news, the editorialopinion,
and the advertising departments at the Pioneer Press
are strictly separated.
For example, if the advertising department is seeking help
in preparing an "advertorial"
(an advertisement written in the form of an objective
opinion editorial), the advertising
department will get no help from the editorial-opinion
department.
Later in the meeting discussion returned to the potential
of advertorials--provided
a financing approach could be found--as a possible way to
gain coverage and circulation
of information that otherwise would not be covered
7. News no longer a revenue producer--
Lee Canning said that in heyday
of
newspapers, the split in income between advertising and
newspaper sales was about
60-40. Westover said that split now is about 90-10 or even
95-5. Canning said the
Audit Bureau of Circulation no longer counts circulation
of newspapers on Mondays and
Tuesdays because those are very poor advertising days.
8. A distinction between being overtly partisan and being
political-- As
background for a direction that he thinks newspapers
should go, Westover introduced
the topic by addressing the issues of objectivity and
transparency versus fairness and
balance. Regardless of a newspaper's political leanings,
it needs to be objective and
transparent in its presentation of the news. Westover said
he hopes to see some day a
newspaper in the Twin Cities area with a libertarian
political view. Such a newspaper
would attract a group of readers with that political bent.
But such a newspaper would
not rant and rave against views, as some overtly partisan
bloggers do, he said.
Readers in a libertarian newspaper would expect objective,
but not necessarily,
balanced coverage.
Further, Westover argued, it isn't good to try to be so
balanced as to distort the
real truth an event. He remembers the "balanced" coverage
of a debate between Rod
Grams, Mark Dayton and a third party candidate, some
six-seven years ago. The
reporters dutifully provided concise statements of the
positions of the candidates on the
major issues discussed, even though, Westover said, it was
obvious in the debate that
Grams did a far better job on the Social Security
discussion and Dayton did a far better
job on social issues. When Westover writes, he said he
works to write the truth, not
just be balanced. He said his own bias plays into that and
needs to be considered by
the reader. Arguments ultimately stand on their own merit,
regardless of bias, he said.
9. A new business model for newspapers--
Westover believes the future
lies
with newspapers that are less concerned with fairness and
balance and more with
objectivity and transparency. The old business model is a
broadcast model that wanted
so many "eyes" reading the newspaper. Continuing his
example of wanting a
newspaper with a libertarian bent, he said that such a
paper would have a narrow
audience, an audience that, faced with many choices, would
opt in to read that paper
over others.
Further, he said, with a new business model, the newspaper
would be trying to
entice its readers to go to a website, where the paper
would be able to learn much more
about its audience and gain information that would enable
it to do more "narrowcasting".
There's no such thing as the "general public" any more.
10. Potential of reaching a narrow audience that craves
good public
affairs information--
Noting the decline of public
affairs information in the mainstream
media, Verne Johnson inquired about the potential of
narrowcasting to serve the people
interested in public affairs. Westover mentioned the
St. Paul Legal Ledger, a paper that
runs legal notices (http://www.legal-ledger.com/about_us/index.cfm),
and calls itself "the
only independent newspaper dedicated to covering the
Minnesota Legislature, politics
and public policy." Subscriptions to the twice-weekly
publication are $104 a year. The
point here is that the Legal Ledger is targeting a
very narrow audience for whom the
“news” is worth $104 a year. An alternative might be
patronage-sponsored news
sources, much like the early days of journalism when
political parties and specific
newspapers were closely aligned, he said.
11. Limitations of some web based publications--
Some information
websites
are simply finding information that others have collected.
There aren't a lot of ways to
make money on that model, because it is at the whim of
what others are doing,
Westover said.
12. Parallel between a subscription to a publication and a
contribution to a
non-profit organization--
In discussion about whether an
outlet would be a non-profit or
a for-profit organization, it was noted that non-profit
organizations like MPR receive taxdeductible
contributions and other organizations charge
subscriptions. The question
came up whether subscriptions to media publications should
also be tax-deductible.
In the continuing discussion about MPR as a model for news
coverage in the
future, John Rollwagen clarified that MPR doesn't receive
government subsidies any
more, other than government grants sometimes are given to
small towns for antennas to
receive the MPR signal.
13. Electronic or print distribution in the future--
Westover contrasted
older
people, who are digital immigrants, with younger people,
who are digital natives. The
long-term future clearly is with the internet, not with
ink and paper, he said. Today
newspapers still have the credibility. The internet has
broken several good stories, but
those stories gained legitimacy only when they were picked
up by the mainstream
media, he said. Later Westover added to his comments by
stating that the key is who
are the people of influence, not what media do they use.
That will be a key in who drives
the media agenda.
14. "Marketing Myopia"--
In discussing changes that need
to occur, Westover
mentioned `Marketing Myopia' by Theodore Levit t,
published in the
Harvard Business
Review ,
of which he was an editor. Its theme was that the vision of most
organizations
was constricted in terms of what they, too narrowly, saw
as the business they were in. It
exhorted CEOs to re-examine their corporate vision; and
redefine their markets in terms
of wider perspectives.
15. Example of radio station strategy --
Westover said he worked with some
radio stations on building better business models for the
future. Rather than relying only
on broadcasting, the strategies called for the radio
stations to stimulate listeners to go to
web sites, where with the skillful use of commercial
offers, the stations were able to
narrow their audiences. The group again made reference to
MPR, where some had
visited this past week. John Rollwagen discussed the
development of public insight
journalism (PIJ), a new program at MPR, with some 25,000
individuals who are feeding
news-related ideas to MPR with its staff of 25 regular
reporters, plus about six persons in
its PIJ arm.
16. Relying too much on publicists for information--
Westover, who writes
frequently on offering educational choice, said he
believes that the education reporters
today receive 80-90 percent of story ideas from the press
releases of the educational
establishment. Other perspectives are not getting adequate
coverage, he said.
17. Thanks-- The
group thanked Westover for meeting with us today.
|
The Civic Caucus
is a non-partisan,
tax-exempt educational organization. Core participants
include persons of varying political persuasions, reflecting
years of leadership in politics and business.
A working group meets face-to-face to
provide leadership. They are Verne C. Johnson, chair; Lee
Canning, Charles Clay, Bill Frenzel,
Paul Gilje, Jim Hetland,
John Mooty, Jim Olson, Wayne Popham and John Rollwagen.
Click Here to
see a biographical statement of each. |
|